Pular para o conteúdo principal

Neo-Chaplinism

Neo-chaplinism flag
Neo-Chaplinism refers to a theory / ideology / doctrine / political and humorous movement based on the ideas, speeches, and presentations of comedian Charlie Chaplin, whose aim is to maintain Charlie Chaplin's legacy and to enhance the Chaplinism.

Neo-chaplinism has a number of influences such as positive humor, menteirism, menteirinhism, Monteirianism, extraphysicism, psionicism, psionic-vibrationalism, biosocialism, psionsocialism, extrasocialism, musbism, chespiritism, stancapism, neo-pryorism, neo-anysioism, national-bolshevism , empathirism, mosleyanism, duginism and even of the minecraftism, retarded humorism, syndicalism and distributism.

Neo-chaplinism criticizes Carlinism, Lennybrucism, Humorinegrism (Blackhumorism), Nietzschianism, Marxism, Orwellism, Voegelinism, Olavism, Transhumanism, Chippism, Chamadism, Cynicism, Atheism, and Marxism. Neo-chaplinism defends the practice of positive humor and at the same time forms of making deep criticisms in a positive and constructive way as well. Defending spiritualization and clarification of society, increasing the vibrational state of the Earth and people, neo-chaplinism works in the essence of people, in the true essence of people, thus enabling the fastest spiritualization, awakening and union of society.

If there are incentives to extraphysical, spiritual, non-physical and energy manipulation, it advocates the awakening of consciousness and spiritual awakening, both individually and collectively, also advocating turning humans into multidimensional beings. there is a strong presence of de-cellularization, de-transhumanization and deschipalization policies, with the removal of chemtrails and nanoparticles within people, through extraphysical, non-physical, vibrationalism, psionicism and extraphysicism.

In the government, neo-chaplinism advocates a government based on direct-participatory democracy and syndicalism, and a distributive-cooperative economy, on the issue of science and technology, neo-chaplinism argues that everyone can do science or contribute in some way social-technocracy), with a science focused on biology, extraphysical, non-physical, psiontechnology, spiritual technologies (spiritecnologia-spirit-technology), extraphysical and non-physical technologies.

Defended the total democratization of society and the use of consensus, referendums and plebiscites to decide the course of the nation. Along with de-transhumanization, deschipalization and decellularization, neo-chaplinism advocates the implantation of the system of vibrational identification and spiritual recognition, via-consciousness communication and extraphysical and non-physical technologies (as energy feeders, ultra-vibrational medicine, materializers, etc.). ). Proposing the end and overcoming of consumerism to a mentality where there is no lack and where what prevails is help and cooperation.

Neo-chaplinism also advocates the end of world elites and elitism, overcoming and demystifying conspiracy, overcoming nation-state concepts, creating a single nation based on "unity in diversity," and turning humans into beings multidimensional and in entities. Neo-chaplinism is characterized by being anti-liberal, anti-Zionist, anti-Carlinist, anti-Lennybrucist, anti-conspiracyist, anti-NWO, anti-globalist, anti-transhumanist, anti-cynist, anti-Nietzschean, anti- Orwellianist, anti-blackhumorist, anti-chamadist, anti-nihilist and anti-singularist.

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

Social Luddism

Social luddism, also known as left-wing luddism, social neoluddism and as left-wing neoluddism, is a political and cultural movement that defends the fight against the cultural industry, the mass media and the mass culture, in order to improve the living conditions of the population and clean up people's minds, social-luddism is also characterized by advocating a reduction in the use of technology at work and in people's lives, so that technology is used only for certain situations and for situations in which the use of technology is really necessary, as in health cases. Social Luddism is also characterized by defending a new class struggle between the digital proletariat and the digital bourgeoisie, as well as defending that the internet, the cultural industry, the mass media and the mass culture are used to oppress the proletariat and spread propaganda in favor of the digital bourgeoisie. Social Luddism is characterized by defending anti-capitalism, anti-rightism, anti-global...

The Difference Between Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism

Much is asked about the difference between neoliberalism and neoconservatism, both are quite similar, but have several differences between them. Neo-liberalism deals with the economic issue, while neo-conservatism deals with the social and cultural question, neoconservatism has as neoliberalism its economic form, which is the minimal state and an anti-interventionist and anti-protectionist state, with only one exception for neo-conservatism of the developed countries, which allow a semi-protectionist and semi-interventionist state, since neoliberalism has two main currents, that of the minimal state and that of the semi-interventionist and semi-protectionist state, which confuses a great deal when differentiating . Neoconservatism deals with the "liberal in the economy and conservative in customs", being more precise "neoliberal in the economy and neoconservative in customs", defending the minimal state, a serville and neo-liberal economy, and an anti-communist,...

Awtokism

Awtokism is a term coined by William Ariel Mounter to refer to a set of policies and actions aimed at attacking and humiliating mythicals (empaths, sensitives, psychics, otherkins, gods, starseeds, etc.), especially in the media and in video games. Awtokism is derived from the term AWTOK, which is the name of a hypothetical organization that aims to hunt, torture, experiment and kill mythicals. Awtokism, as an ideology, has neoliberalism as economic policy, which can vary between neoliberalism and state capitalism, and as a policy, it has democracy as a state policy, which can vary between democracy and authoritarianism / neofascism. Awtokism also advocates the persecution of myths and that all media, including video games, must attack and humiliate mythicals including encouraging persecution of mythicals.